H. P. Lovecraft: The Complete Collection (Kindle Edition eBook)
$1
$11.90
+74Deal Score
17,504 Views
Amazon has H. P. Lovecraft: The Complete Collection (Kindle Edition eBook) on sale for $0.99.
Thanks to Community Member ChrisB6338 for sharing this deal.
Note, this digital Kindle eBook will be deliver to your Kindle/compatible devices after purchase
About this item:
Howard Phillips Lovecraft was an American author who achieved posthumous fame through his influential works of horror fiction. Virtually unknown and only published in pulp magazines before he died in poverty, he is now regarded as one of the most significant 20th-century authors in his genre. Lovecraft was born in Providence, Rhode Island, where he spent most of his life. Among his most celebrated tales is "The Call of Cthulhu", canonical to the Cthulhu Mythos. Never able to support himself from earnings as author and editor, Lovecraft saw commercial success increasingly elude him in this latter period, partly because he lacked the confidence and drive to promote himself. He subsisted in progressively straitened circumstances in his last years; an inheritance was completely spent by the time he died at the age of 46
Length: 1,547 pages
Publication info: Published Sept 12, 2022 by Pocket Classic
Editor's Notes & Price Research
Written by
About this Deal:
Overall rated 4.7 out of 5 stars from over 10,500 total reviews.
About this Store:
Don't have Amazon Prime? Students can get a free 6-Month Amazon Prime trial with free 2-day shipping, unlimited video streaming & more.
Don't have Amazon Prime? Students can get a free 6-Month Amazon Prime trial with free 2-day shipping, unlimited video streaming & more.
If you're not a student, there's also a free 1-Month Amazon Prime trial available.
You can also earn cash back rewards on Amazon and Whole Foods purchases with the Amazon Prime Visa credit card. Read our review to see if it’s the right card for you.
One dollar is a fine price to save you some effort for sure, but he never copyrighted his works so you can find them all for free/public domain various ways if you are interested.
My point is that works of cultural significance, like Lovecraft's mythos, should be recognized for it's contributions to society without the constant need to footnote the flaws of the creator every time it is mentioned.
Jules Verne, who is arguably the father of science fiction, has many instances of what we would deem as "problematic" views on various ethnicities in his writings. Yet, anyone reading "Around the World in 80 Days" today does not need disclaimers about the author or the content because it is obvious this classic work is from the perspective of the cultural norms from the time and place it was written.
Charles Dickens, Virginia Woolf, George Bernard Shaw; the list goes on and on with celebrated authors that held and published views that are no longer mainstream in society. The same argument applies to other culturally significant entertainment media, i.e., classic movies and television. Again, I don't feel that there is a need to patronize the readers or viewers with contextualizing the creator's views; classical works are essentially time capsules with an implied understanding that they represent different and fluctuating societal norms throughout history. It is incumbent upon the reader or viewer to discern the antiquated concepts.
Realize that 100 years from now many of our current cultural views and their influence and depictions in our entertainment will be considered archaic and scorned. As we judge history so shall we be judged in history.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank majestros
09-23-2022 at 04:17 AM.
One dollar is a fine price to save you some effort for sure, but he never copyrighted his works so you can find them all for free/public domain various ways if you are interested.
I truly don't care that HP Lovecraft was racist. It's the fact that he embedded racist ideology into his works, and that he simply was not a good writer. There's no critic on earth that would consider him to be a good writer; he was ahead of his time in terms of concepts and imagination, with little talent for writing.
My point is that works of cultural significance, like Lovecraft's mythos, should be recognized for it's contributions to society without the constant need to footnote the flaws of the creator every time it is mentioned.
Jules Verne, who is arguably the father of science fiction, has many instances of what we would deem as "problematic" views on various ethnicities in his writings. Yet, anyone reading "Around the World in 80 Days" today does not need disclaimers about the author or the content because it is obvious this classic work is from the perspective of the cultural norms from the time and place it was written.
Charles Dickens, Virginia Woolf, George Bernard Shaw; the list goes on and on with celebrated authors that held and published views that are no longer mainstream in society. The same argument applies to other culturally significant entertainment media, i.e., classic movies and television. Again, I don't feel that there is a need to patronize the readers or viewers with contextualizing the creator's views; classical works are essentially time capsules with an implied understanding that they represent different and fluctuating societal norms throughout history. It is incumbent upon the reader or viewer to discern the antiquated concepts.
Realize that 100 years from now many of our current cultural views and their influence and depictions in our entertainment will be considered archaic and scorned. As we judge history so shall we be judged in history.
(This is not a debate on H.P.Lovecraft and his writings)
I have probably 4-5 of these "complete collections" in my Kindle library. HPL's writings are out of copyright and it is easy for an enterprising "publisher" to quickly cobble together an e-book and put in on Amazon with a price of a buck or so.
So the real question is: how is this edition different from dozens of others. The content (assuming it is truly "complete") is more or less the same, so it is about formatting, illustrations, commentary, notes etc. So far, looking through the comments (Amazon's bundling of different editions on one page doesn't help), there is nothing distinguishing this particular edition. Thus, if you already own one (or more), there's no crime in passing up on this one.
(This is not a debate on H.P.Lovecraft and his writings)
I have probably 4-5 of these "complete collections" in my Kindle library. HPL's writings are out of copyright and it is easy for an enterprising "publisher" to quickly cobble together an e-book and put in on Amazon with a price of a buck or so.
So the real question is: how is this edition different from dozens of others. The content (assuming it is truly "complete") is more or less the same, so it is about formatting, illustrations, commentary, notes etc. So far, looking through the comments (Amazon's bundling of different editions on one page doesn't help), there is nothing distinguishing this particular edition. Thus, if you already own one (or more), there's no crime in passing up on this one.
Some of his works definitely do still have copyright attached to them. Otherwise, we would've had a more complete collection of his works on StandardEbooks[standardebooks.org] by now.
FWIW, I agree, any one of these is as good as the next, because the text is likely going to be the same on all of them, and the formatting is going to be garbage.
IMO, the only Lovecraft collection that's actually worth investing in is the Annotated Lovecraft[amazon.com], as the scholarly notes and footnotes are quite enjoyable to read.
Some of his works definitely do still have copyright attached to them. Otherwise, we would've had a more complete collection of his works on StandardEbooks[standardebooks.org] by now.
FWIW, I agree, any one of these is as good as the next, because the text is likely going to be the same on all of them, and the formatting is going to be garbage.
IMO, the only Lovecraft collection that's actually worth investing in is the Annotated Lovecraft[amazon.com], as the scholarly notes and footnotes are quite enjoyable to read.
Indeed, "Annotated Lovecraft" is probably the best available printed edition (I have both this one as well as "Beyond Arkham" follow-up (along with maybe 2-3 generic-but-nice complete collections :-)) I just wish they did a true Kindle edition - the one referenced on that Amazon page is sadly yet another generic one.
12 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Featured Comments
Jules Verne, who is arguably the father of science fiction, has many instances of what we would deem as "problematic" views on various ethnicities in his writings. Yet, anyone reading "Around the World in 80 Days" today does not need disclaimers about the author or the content because it is obvious this classic work is from the perspective of the cultural norms from the time and place it was written.
Charles Dickens, Virginia Woolf, George Bernard Shaw; the list goes on and on with celebrated authors that held and published views that are no longer mainstream in society. The same argument applies to other culturally significant entertainment media, i.e., classic movies and television. Again, I don't feel that there is a need to patronize the readers or viewers with contextualizing the creator's views; classical works are essentially time capsules with an implied understanding that they represent different and fluctuating societal norms throughout history. It is incumbent upon the reader or viewer to discern the antiquated concepts.
Realize that 100 years from now many of our current cultural views and their influence and depictions in our entertainment will be considered archaic and scorned. As we judge history so shall we be judged in history.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
https://play.google.com/store/boo...0OBAAAQBA
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank majestros
https://www.amazon.com/H-P-Lovecr...65&sr=
https://www.amazon.com/H-P-Lovecr...65&sr=8-24 [amazon.com]
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Jules Verne, who is arguably the father of science fiction, has many instances of what we would deem as "problematic" views on various ethnicities in his writings. Yet, anyone reading "Around the World in 80 Days" today does not need disclaimers about the author or the content because it is obvious this classic work is from the perspective of the cultural norms from the time and place it was written.
Charles Dickens, Virginia Woolf, George Bernard Shaw; the list goes on and on with celebrated authors that held and published views that are no longer mainstream in society. The same argument applies to other culturally significant entertainment media, i.e., classic movies and television. Again, I don't feel that there is a need to patronize the readers or viewers with contextualizing the creator's views; classical works are essentially time capsules with an implied understanding that they represent different and fluctuating societal norms throughout history. It is incumbent upon the reader or viewer to discern the antiquated concepts.
Realize that 100 years from now many of our current cultural views and their influence and depictions in our entertainment will be considered archaic and scorned. As we judge history so shall we be judged in history.
I have probably 4-5 of these "complete collections" in my Kindle library. HPL's writings are out of copyright and it is easy for an enterprising "publisher" to quickly cobble together an e-book and put in on Amazon with a price of a buck or so.
So the real question is: how is this edition different from dozens of others. The content (assuming it is truly "complete") is more or less the same, so it is about formatting, illustrations, commentary, notes etc. So far, looking through the comments (Amazon's bundling of different editions on one page doesn't help), there is nothing distinguishing this particular edition. Thus, if you already own one (or more), there's no crime in passing up on this one.
I have probably 4-5 of these "complete collections" in my Kindle library. HPL's writings are out of copyright and it is easy for an enterprising "publisher" to quickly cobble together an e-book and put in on Amazon with a price of a buck or so.
So the real question is: how is this edition different from dozens of others. The content (assuming it is truly "complete") is more or less the same, so it is about formatting, illustrations, commentary, notes etc. So far, looking through the comments (Amazon's bundling of different editions on one page doesn't help), there is nothing distinguishing this particular edition. Thus, if you already own one (or more), there's no crime in passing up on this one.
FWIW, I agree, any one of these is as good as the next, because the text is likely going to be the same on all of them, and the formatting is going to be garbage.
IMO, the only Lovecraft collection that's actually worth investing in is the Annotated Lovecraft [amazon.com], as the scholarly notes and footnotes are quite enjoyable to read.
FWIW, I agree, any one of these is as good as the next, because the text is likely going to be the same on all of them, and the formatting is going to be garbage.
IMO, the only Lovecraft collection that's actually worth investing in is the Annotated Lovecraft [amazon.com], as the scholarly notes and footnotes are quite enjoyable to read.