Why do people want zipped luggage? this is easily opened with a pen or knife.
Even ignoring the security aspect, what I've never understood/liked about zipped hard size luggage is that it's not fully hard. Sure, the sides will have (some) protection from piercing, I guess, but the overall luggage provides little to no practical crush resistance.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank dman081
01-25-2023 at 10:32 AM.
Quote
from Aegann
:
Hard sides is actually lighter than the cloth counterpart
It wasn't when I looked.
Edit: So I do see that the two Samsonite pairs that Costco offers —one hard sided the other soft — aren't the same size. The large soft-sided ones are lighter, but they measure out to more than 1cubic foot less internal space, and the weight-to-space efficiency is much better with the hard-sided. A cubic foot less is a meaningful difference, but with the ability to overpack soft sided luggage, I do wonder how much of a difference that end up being…or if you reach the 50 lb airline weight limit before that extra space matters.
Hard sided 27"
14.9 lbs
3.85 ft3 internal volume
3.87 pounds per ft3
Another edit: I've only been looking at large suitcases (that's all I need right now; I wish they would sell these separately). But you're right about the carry-on size — the hard sided is lighter than the soft sided, at 6.39 to 8.5 lbs. For most that probably doesn't matter since I've never seen enforcing carry-on weights limits.
The hard carry-on shows 2,340 inches of interior volume compared to 2,316 inches for the soft. But that almost certainly isn't a meaningful difference, and the soft might even allow considerably more to be packed than the hard.
How does this set compare to the Samsonite OMNI 2 3-PC set that normally sells for $206? Is the latter one a better deal since you get a 25-in one for just $40 more?
Why is hard sided better for you? It's more water resistant, maybe easier to stack, and perhaps a bit tougher to cut into?
But it's less expandable and heavier, which is a huge thing for large luggage and 50lb luggage limits. It doesn't add up for me.
I personally would not check in any hard side luggage, because it will be damaged regardless it is ABS or poly. So for large checked luggage, better to have soft-side ones.
Edit: So I do see that the two Samsonite pairs that Costco offers —one hard sided the other soft — aren't the same size. The large soft-sided ones are lighter, but they measure out to more than 1cubic foot less internal space, and the weight-to-space efficiency is much better with the hard-sided. A cubic foot less is a meaningful difference, but with the ability to overpack soft sided luggage, I do wonder how much of a difference that end up being…or if you reach the 50 lb airline weight limit before that extra space matters.
Hard sided 27"
14.9 lbs
3.85 ft3 internal volume
3.87 pounds per ft3
Another edit: I've only been looking at large suitcases (that's all I need right now; I wish they would sell these separately). But you're right about the carry-on size — the hard sided is lighter than the soft sided, at 6.39 to 8.5 lbs. For most that probably don't matter since I've never seen enforcing carry-on weights limits.
The hard carry-on shows 2,340 inches of interior volume compared to 2,316 inches for the soft. But that almost certainly isn't a meaningful difference, and the soft might even allow considerably more to be packed than the hard.
It has been discussed in previous threads that the website description is wrong and that the box claims a weight of 11lbs.
This is a warehouse club, of course they only sell luggage in bundles. If you want individual pieces shop elsewhere.
If Costco is cheaper even with two pieces vs. one elsewhere, buy it and give the small one away.
If you want to abuse the costco return policy and return it after using it for years, put the extra piece into storage until then.
The same warehouse club sell certain items individually, such as pants and wiper blades. Pointing out that they are warehouse club does not fully explain why they cannot sell luggage individually.
The same warehouse club sell certain items individually, such as pants and wiper blades. Pointing out that they are warehouse club does not fully explain why they cannot sell luggage individually.
How is that a correlation? why don't they sell eggs individually then?
They work out contracts to buy in bulk from the manufacturers or distributors and that may entail selling sets. They place a premium on display spaces and will only carry so much in an area. if they can get a better deal buying the set and their marketing tests shows sets sell better then they will sell sets. If you want singles then go to TJ Maxx.
I am regretting my decision to keep the Samsonite, due to the lack of washable liners and the lack of a bottom handle on the check-in bag.
I didn't think I would mind it, nor the plastic pockets, but the Samsonite is noticeably lower quality compared to the Delsey.
If you are undecided and have both, keep the Delsey. My other luggage has washable liners and it's so much easier to unzip and wash everything after travel, to reduce any chance of bringing critters home. Just vacuuming isn't enough.
If the Delsey ever comes back in stock, I'm trading this back in.
Another:
The Delsey feels higher quality in both hardshell quality (seems thicker) and hardware fit and finish. Extending the handle is solid and smooth and the button offers positive feedback. The liner is easily washable since the pockets aren't plastic and it uses self-healing zippers (I found out when accidentally trying to add too many clothes). The major con is the carry-on size, since it exceeds airline size limits. A minor issue is that the carry-on does not have a lock.
The Samsonite has a lack of fit and finish, but they are within the airline size limits and the carry-on has a lock. The shell is super flimsy, which might be ok if it's treated gently, but Samsonite has a reputation for permanent dents. I don't consider the little hooks useful, since it doesn't have the ability to secure a bag and the interior organization is similar to the Delsey. The liner is not as easily washed, since one of the pockets is solid plastic and will need to be propped open to dry.
52 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Why is hard sided better for you? It's more water resistant, maybe easier to stack, and perhaps a bit tougher to cut into?
But it's less expandable and heavier, which is a huge thing for large luggage and 50lb luggage limits. It doesn't add up for me.
But it's less expandable and heavier, which is a huge thing for large luggage and 50lb luggage limits. It doesn't add up for me.
Hard sides is actually lighter than the cloth counterpart
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank dman081
It wasn't when I looked.
Edit: So I do see that the two Samsonite pairs that Costco offers —one hard sided the other soft — aren't the same size. The large soft-sided ones are lighter, but they measure out to more than 1cubic foot less internal space, and the weight-to-space efficiency is much better with the hard-sided. A cubic foot less is a meaningful difference, but with the ability to overpack soft sided luggage, I do wonder how much of a difference that end up being…or if you reach the 50 lb airline weight limit before that extra space matters.
Hard sided 27"
14.9 lbs
3.85 ft3 internal volume
3.87 pounds per ft3
Cloth 28"
13.8 lbs
2.75 ft3
5 lbs per ft3
https://www.costco.com/samsonite-...48026.html
Another edit: I've only been looking at large suitcases (that's all I need right now; I wish they would sell these separately). But you're right about the carry-on size — the hard sided is lighter than the soft sided, at 6.39 to 8.5 lbs. For most that probably doesn't matter since I've never seen enforcing carry-on weights limits.
The hard carry-on shows 2,340 inches of interior volume compared to 2,316 inches for the soft. But that almost certainly isn't a meaningful difference, and the soft might even allow considerably more to be packed than the hard.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
But it's less expandable and heavier, which is a huge thing for large luggage and 50lb luggage limits. It doesn't add up for me.
Edit: So I do see that the two Samsonite pairs that Costco offers —one hard sided the other soft — aren't the same size. The large soft-sided ones are lighter, but they measure out to more than 1cubic foot less internal space, and the weight-to-space efficiency is much better with the hard-sided. A cubic foot less is a meaningful difference, but with the ability to overpack soft sided luggage, I do wonder how much of a difference that end up being…or if you reach the 50 lb airline weight limit before that extra space matters.
Hard sided 27"
14.9 lbs
3.85 ft3 internal volume
3.87 pounds per ft3
Cloth 28"
13.8 lbs
2.75 ft3
5 lbs per ft3
https://www.costco.com/samsonite-...48026.html [costco.com]
Another edit: I've only been looking at large suitcases (that's all I need right now; I wish they would sell these separately). But you're right about the carry-on size — the hard sided is lighter than the soft sided, at 6.39 to 8.5 lbs. For most that probably don't matter since I've never seen enforcing carry-on weights limits.
The hard carry-on shows 2,340 inches of interior volume compared to 2,316 inches for the soft. But that almost certainly isn't a meaningful difference, and the soft might even allow considerably more to be packed than the hard.
https://slickdeals.net/f/16341259-samsonite-amplitude-2-piece-hardside-set-164-99-in-store-184-99-costco-com?page=4#comm
If Costco is cheaper even with two pieces vs. one elsewhere, buy it and give the small one away.
If you want to abuse the costco return policy and return it after using it for years, put the extra piece into storage until then.
They work out contracts to buy in bulk from the manufacturers or distributors and that may entail selling sets. They place a premium on display spaces and will only carry so much in an area. if they can get a better deal buying the set and their marketing tests shows sets sell better then they will sell sets. If you want singles then go to TJ Maxx.
Heavier than better models.
One comment:
I am regretting my decision to keep the Samsonite, due to the lack of washable liners and the lack of a bottom handle on the check-in bag.
I didn't think I would mind it, nor the plastic pockets, but the Samsonite is noticeably lower quality compared to the Delsey.
If you are undecided and have both, keep the Delsey. My other luggage has washable liners and it's so much easier to unzip and wash everything after travel, to reduce any chance of bringing critters home. Just vacuuming isn't enough.
If the Delsey ever comes back in stock, I'm trading this back in.
Another:
The Delsey feels higher quality in both hardshell quality (seems thicker) and hardware fit and finish. Extending the handle is solid and smooth and the button offers positive feedback. The liner is easily washable since the pockets aren't plastic and it uses self-healing zippers (I found out when accidentally trying to add too many clothes). The major con is the carry-on size, since it exceeds airline size limits. A minor issue is that the carry-on does not have a lock.
The Samsonite has a lack of fit and finish, but they are within the airline size limits and the carry-on has a lock. The shell is super flimsy, which might be ok if it's treated gently, but Samsonite has a reputation for permanent dents. I don't consider the little hooks useful, since it doesn't have the ability to secure a bag and the interior organization is similar to the Delsey. The liner is not as easily washed, since one of the pockets is solid plastic and will need to be propped open to dry.